Effective July 1, 2025, Florida’s construction industry is now operating under a new legal requirement that directly affects how change orders are processed on public projects.
The new “Prompt Processing” provision (Section 218.755 of the Florida Statutes) adds strict deadlines and consequences for how local government entities must respond to contractor-submitted change order price quotes. A key distinction from the previous Prompt Payment Act is that the previous law never addressed how quickly a government entity must act on a change order price quote, a critical omission that Section 218.755 now remedies.
Key Takeaways
- 35-Day Deadline for Government Response
When a contractor submits a local government requested change order price quote that meets all applicable contractual and statutory requirements, the local government must approve or deny the quote in writing within 35 days. - Detailed Denial Required
If the quote is denied, the notice must clearly explain the specific deficiencies and what actions the contractor must take to remedy them. - Government Pays if They Miss the Deadline
If the government fails to issue a timely and detailed response, it becomes liable for all additional costs related to the local government requested change order, including labor, staffing, materials, equipment, and overhead. - No Contractual Workarounds
Local governments cannot contract around or waive the duties imposed by this statute. Any agreement attempting to do so is unenforceable.
What This Means for Local Governments
Local government entities need to closely review their internal processes and procurement procedures for managing local government requested change orders. The law creates new compliance obligations and financial risks, including:
- Strict timing: A 35-day deadline to approve or deny conforming change order requests.
- Detailed communication: Denials must include clear, actionable feedback.
- No waiver clauses: Contracts or procurement rules cannot directly override the obligations in the statute.
Failure to follow these steps can expose an agency to significant unbudgeted costs. The key is to simply address this up front and align procurement processes for creating owner directed change orders in a manner that complies with the process of the local government entities.
What Contractors Need to Know
- Quote Must Be Solid: Only quotes requested by the local government entities that fully comply with contract terms and applicable laws trigger the 35-day rule.
- Expect Stricter Submittal Rules: Agencies (especially airports and large local governments) may tighten up how they define a “received” or “complete” submittal.
- Faster Processing = Fewer Delays: If used properly, this law can help reduce change order backlogs and cost disputes.
Florida contractors working on public jobs need to tighten up their change order submittals and track response timelines closely. Incomplete or defective submittals can still be denied, and may not trigger the protections offered by the statute. Section 218.755 puts pressure on government entities to act fast, but only if contractor paperwork is in order.
Whether you’re a contractor submitting change orders or a local government official reviewing them, now is the time to revisit your internal processes, approval thresholds, and documentation standards.
- Partner
Brett Renton is a partner in the Orlando office of Shutts & Bowen LLP, where he is a member of the Business Litigation Practice Group.
A Certified Circuit Civil Mediator, Brett is a Martindale-Hubbell AV® Preeminent™ rated ...
- Associate
Samendio L. Mathieu is an Associate in the Orlando office of Shutts & Bowen LLP, where he is a member of the Business Litigation Practice Group.
Samendio focuses his practice on complex matters related to business and commercial ...
Search Blog
Subscribe Today
Follow Us
Recent Posts
- Florida’s New 35-Day Change Order Rule: What Contractors and Local Governments Need to Know
- Department of Commerce Denies Orange County’s Vision 2050 Development Plans
- Florida's Choice Act
- Federal Judge Enjoins Significant Portions of DEI Executive Orders
- DOJ Issues Directives on DEI
- Trump Executive Order Rescinds EO 11246 Regarding Affirmative Action for Contractors on Federal Projects
- Recent Florida Court Decision Provides Important Lesson on Construction Defect Damages
- Construction Contractors Should Prepare for the Effects of Potential New Tariffs on Construction Material Prices and Availability
- Federal Court Strikes Down the DOL’s Increased Salary Thresholds for Executive, Administrative, Professional, And Highly Compensated Employee Overtime Exemptions
- Breaking News: FinCEN Postpones Beneficial Ownership Reporting Deadlines for Companies Impacted by Recent Major Storms
Popular Categories
- Construction
- Construction Litigation
- Florida Government Contracts
- Government Contracting
- State Government Contracts
- Employment and Labor
- Business of Real Estate
- Real Estate Law
- Construction
- Development/Land Use
- Litigation
- Landlord-Tenant
- Litigation (Labor & Employment)
- Florida County Lands
- Intellectual Property
- Cybersecurity
- Appeals
- Contracts
- Business
- Competition
- Trusts and Estates
- Supreme Court
- IP Litigation
- Patents
- Data Security
- Technology
- DEI
- Business
- Litigation (Appellate)
- Regulatory Compliance
- Foreclosures
- Privacy
- Department of Labor
- Trademark
- Contracting
- Public Private Partnership
- Estate planning
- Compliance
- Financial Institutions
- Florida Public Contracts
- Government Contracts
- International Dispute Resolution
- Lease
- Government
- Patent Office
- Wealth planning
- Conveyances
- Federal Government Contracting
- Insurance
- Appellate Blog
- Florida Bid Protests
- Public Contracts
- Infringement
- Property Tax
- Health Care
- Salary
- Proposal Writing
- Public Bidding
- GAO
- Bid Protest
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Cyber fraud
- Public Finance
- International
- Grant Writing
- Copyright
- Arbitration
- Restrictive Covenants
- Promissory Notes
- Florida Procurement
- Public procurement
- Title
- International Arbitration and Litigation
- Small Business
- Liens and encumbrances
- General Liability
- PTAB
- Technology
- Consumer Privacy
- International Arbitration
- Bidding
- Creditor's Rights
- Attorneys' Fees
- Venue
- Ad Valorem Assessments
- Inter Partes Review
- Attorneys' Fees
- Liens
- Florida Administrative Law
- Consumer Protection
- Regulation
- Contracting
- Government Vendor
- Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
- Bankruptcy
- Florida Public Procurement
- Power Generation
- Mortgages
- Record on Appeal
- FINRA
- Rehearing
- Loan guaranties
- Russia-Related Arbitration
- Eviction
- Statute of limitations
- Statute of repose
- Liens
- Damages
- Patents - Assignor Estoppel
- Briefing
- Dispute Resolution
- Patents - Obviousness
- Request for Proposal
- Commercial Brokerage
- Trade Secrets
- Maritime
- Bid Writing
- Florida Bidding Strategies
- Renewal
- Attorneys' Fees
- Florida Economic Incentive Packages
- Jury Instructions
- Stay
- Certiorari
- Design Professionals
- Forum Selection
- email hacking
- Offers of Judgment
- Prevailing Party
- Settlements
- Assignment of Contract
- Assignment of Proceeds
- Banking
- Designer Liability
- Finality
- Fintech
- Lis Pendens
- Marketing/Advertising
- Appellate Jurisdiction - Deadlines
- Evidence
- Evidence
- Expert
- Expert Science
- Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure
- Federal Supply Schedule
- Florida Public Records Law
- Mootness
- Preservation
- Socio-Economic Programs
- Sunshine Law
- Unlicensed Contracting
- Veteran Owned Business
- Homestead
- Partnerships and LLCs
- Standing
Editors
- Of Counsel
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Senior Associate
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Of Counsel
- Senior Associate
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
Archives
- October 2025
- July 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- February 2024
- November 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- October 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016